TIME TRAVELS HUBAcademic journal
COMPUTER SCIENCE
TIME TRAVELS HUB · Academic journal
COMPUTER SCIENCE
Computation, intelligent systems, information and responsible digital innovation.
Subjects & subdisciplines
Research archive
4 publicationsShowing 1–4 of 4
Accountability Structures for Automated Decisions
By Time Travels Hub Research Office
This editorial demonstration paper examines accountability structures for automated decisions as a contemporary question within AI Ethics. The study sets out the conceptual background to the problem, reviews the principal positions in the current literature, and proposes a structured framework through which the topic can be evaluated by researchers, students and practitioners. Evidence is drawn from published scholarship, comparative cases and established analytical practice in the discipline, and is organised around three guiding questions: what is currently known, where the evidence remains contested, and which methods offer the clearest route to progress. The findings are presented as a reasoned synthesis rather than as new empirical data, and are intended to illustrate the structure, tone and rigour expected of full-length publications hosted on Time Travels Hub. The paper closes with practical recommendations for researchers entering the field and with a short agenda for future work.
Consent and Provenance in Training Data
By Time Travels Hub Editorial Team
This editorial demonstration paper examines consent and provenance in training data as a contemporary question within AI Ethics. The study sets out the conceptual background to the problem, reviews the principal positions in the current literature, and proposes a structured framework through which the topic can be evaluated by researchers, students and practitioners. Evidence is drawn from published scholarship, comparative cases and established analytical practice in the discipline, and is organised around three guiding questions: what is currently known, where the evidence remains contested, and which methods offer the clearest route to progress. The findings are presented as a reasoned synthesis rather than as new empirical data, and are intended to illustrate the structure, tone and rigour expected of full-length publications hosted on Time Travels Hub. The paper closes with practical recommendations for researchers entering the field and with a short agenda for future work.
Fairness Metrics and Their Political Assumptions
By Time Travels Hub Research Office
This editorial demonstration paper examines fairness metrics and their political assumptions as a contemporary question within AI Ethics. The study sets out the conceptual background to the problem, reviews the principal positions in the current literature, and proposes a structured framework through which the topic can be evaluated by researchers, students and practitioners. Evidence is drawn from published scholarship, comparative cases and established analytical practice in the discipline, and is organised around three guiding questions: what is currently known, where the evidence remains contested, and which methods offer the clearest route to progress. The findings are presented as a reasoned synthesis rather than as new empirical data, and are intended to illustrate the structure, tone and rigour expected of full-length publications hosted on Time Travels Hub. The paper closes with practical recommendations for researchers entering the field and with a short agenda for future work.
Meaningful Human Oversight in Deployed Systems
By Time Travels Hub Editorial Team
This editorial demonstration paper examines meaningful human oversight in deployed systems as a contemporary question within AI Ethics. The study sets out the conceptual background to the problem, reviews the principal positions in the current literature, and proposes a structured framework through which the topic can be evaluated by researchers, students and practitioners. Evidence is drawn from published scholarship, comparative cases and established analytical practice in the discipline, and is organised around three guiding questions: what is currently known, where the evidence remains contested, and which methods offer the clearest route to progress. The findings are presented as a reasoned synthesis rather than as new empirical data, and are intended to illustrate the structure, tone and rigour expected of full-length publications hosted on Time Travels Hub. The paper closes with practical recommendations for researchers entering the field and with a short agenda for future work.